As correctly read the book Don Quixote de la Mancha

interpretation Spain and read cervantes don qujite

Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra

Before interpreting a literary work we analyze in depth the author of that work.
Cervantes was a genius of literature.
But ... Why? It is said that he is a genius?
Miguel was a soldier in Spain, in mid-1569.
was taken prisoner in 1575 in Algiers.
first point.

Interestingly, since the fight in the war and his work is a gentleman who "goes to war."
But that's basic.

Chapter 1 -> 10 Interpretation

We are introduced to Don Quixote, a crazy character in the books of literature of chivalry, such was his madness that he decided to become a knight.
Which presents a common problem in France and Spain, the great candidate on noble hardly have any money (Don Quixote was poor).

Then Don Quixote came to a sale.
Here praises women for sale as if they were princesses. EYE with this part.
What does this mean?
Perhaps the princesses of that time (that of Cervantes) is behaving like uneducated peasant?
Interestingly, remember that Cervantes was a soldier and served to the Nobles and their queens.

Then she meets Andrew, a child who were whipping.
It seems normal eh?
But perhaps the great Spain should have children working?
Cervantes is complaining of the life of that time, the children worked.

Let ...

Windmills, incredible partly true.
Don Quixote attacks a few windmills. Gives a lot of laughter, as the madness
Don Quixote came to an end.
But perhaps Cervantes mills add nothing?

The mills represent the industry of that time, the people who give food to the people, and maybe, why not the King.
The mills give food to the people, and Don Quixote is attacking "the giant."
Don Quixote is attacking the king.

Cervantes, is a genius.

Chapter 23

I skipped to Chapter 23, I hope you caught the essence of interpreting this book of Don Quixote.
But here is a fucking essential that I note.
The convicts, inmates, prisoners, and the call were released by the Quixote because he thought that his sentence was unjust.
Was it the judicial system of this era, bad?
At its own discretion.

Gentlemen, the literature is passion, there to understand it.
Thanks, comment leave point or press the X.

Thanks.