Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta rights. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando entradas con la etiqueta rights. Mostrar todas las entradas

domingo, 22 de mayo de 2011

'Rights eBook Reader


ex_yayi


Rights of the Reader Digital Book



The ebooks were not made to be hidden as the lost city of Atlantis, buried and the treasures of Monte Cristo or to be stored in secret vaults and not be seen again. Still, it seems that some people do not understand. Our Information Age offers many challenges for all those involved in digital books, including readers, authors and publishers.

Unfortunately, in seeking to ensure its content many publishers are cutting the rights of readers and limiting the functionality of their books. How? Using DRM (Digital Rights Management), a lot of methods that the industry uses to reduce the chances of copying and piracy, although it is said that piracy does not exist, but have their "side effects" that usually affect only consumers.

Trying to make a little awareness about the reality of the DRM in ebooks has emerged page Readers Bill of Rights, developed by the librarian and technologist Alycia Sellier Matthew Goins. They then presented their ideas about DRM and how it affects the readers of ebooks, offering alternatives to these methods of control and encourage readers to defend their right to read.

It is by reason of the latter that they have drafted the Declaration of the Rights eBook Reader, a series of guidelines that can be consulted before buying an electronic book or e-reader. The statement embodies in its simplicity the needs of readers. I leave then.

Declaration of the Rights eBook Reader

1. Ability to retain, store and transfer the materials purchased
2. Ability to create a paper copy of the entire product
3. Digital books must be in an open format (for example, could read a computer, not just a device)
4. Choice of hardware to access the books (for example, in 3 years, when the device no longer serves, it still can read the book in another hardware regardless of manufacturer)
5. The reader's information should be private (your data will not be stored, sold or traded)

As we see, when we use the traditional printed material we already have these rights protected, so it is logical to expect that we will not be denied solely because of changing the way we read.

The issue is important for everyone, because even though we love those books we print, we will sooner or later the need to use one address and it is important to maintain our security as readers. If you want to keep the discussion on Twitter you can follow or follow @ readersrights hashtag # readersrights. If users are not those who defend our rights who will do it for us?

Source







Roberto Gomez Bolanos: The post you deserve

We want to hear great music? ... Enter!

author taringa rights

author taringa rights


Hi folks, these days are put together many threads in the issue by ruling against!
The ruling states:


Sixth Court of Appeals Court for Criminal and Correctional upheld the charge of "necessary participant" in violation of the Copyright Act against the two owners of the site, because they knew the illegality of the maneuver and allowed discharge, stated that "intellectual property is a right of authors to guarantees and anything that affects it, suggests that the law is not respected."


Here are the complete failure for those who want to read:
http://www.errepar.com/aol/documento...oT29-04-11.pdf




This means that it is against the law to violate the copyright, if you want to discuss if this good or bad law, but this is today is law and must be complacent



You will say that all went down a little once! and if true, but that makes us go unpunished or T! or us but there are a couple of points I would like to place




1:, making the excuse that they can not review the post and are not accomplices to what users up when we all know well have a protocol where if you put something that is GORE, distasteful, pornographic or, what then once they ban would contradict and that if they can control certain things, and I wonder others do not?

2: Now ask users for collaboration to support T! when most were censored for saying something we did not like or give our opinion (probably this post will be running with the same fate) and not only that, but it is his rebuttal to wash their hands and say no more, no Unless the culprits are users and not them.

3: This is very personal, but I do not want them to disappear T! just as it was long ago a website as well COLLECTIVE INTELLIGENCE slogan says, not only download music, books, programs, etc, if not good contributions we can make smart users

4: Finally T! always been a site for profit, not a partnership in which everyone reached revenue, then I wonder, where users do not have profits, but losses have to support?



THIS POST WILL PROBABLY BE BANNED OR REPORTED, GO TO KNOW WHY, BUT WOULD BE GOOD THAT STARTED TO MAKE A MORE OPEN PAGE AND WE CAN SPEAK FOR MORE THAN THE OWNER OF THE SITE do not like, as ultimately t! IS WHAT IT IS THANKS TO U.S.